Jevons, M. P., and you will Parker, Yards. T. (1964). J. din. Highway., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. Meters. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Alive, I., and Nichols, A beneficial. C. (1961).J. inject. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, An effective. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, M. (1960). Jap. J. moist. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you can Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1958). step 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. M., Plotkin, S. A good., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you will Pidcoe, V. (1960). Technology, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Yards. T. (1966). When you look at the “New Scientific Foundation regarding Medication Yearly Remark” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. School away from London area, The fresh new Athlone Press, London area. Parker, M. T., Todinson, An excellent. J. H., and you can Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
The new parasexual cycle and its use in genetic analysis
Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a great d . , 66,605. Poole, P. Meters., and Baker, J. Roentgen. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty five, 116-123. Statement (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,9, 115-118. Declaration (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., thirteen, 119-122. Statement (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Report (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Meters. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Yards., and you can Asheshov, Elizabeth. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Yards., and Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, Good. C., and Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, 25, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and Wilson, J. B. (1958). Have always been.3. moist. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Street. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Road. Buc
Tarr, H. An excellent. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. A good. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. Roentgen., and you may Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114 escort girls in Richmond, 179188.
Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. Elizabeth. O., and Jevons, Yards. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. O., and you will Rippon, J. Elizabeth. (1952). J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, Roentgen. Age. O., Rippon, J. Age., and you can Dowsett, L. Yards. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, G. S., and you may Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.
Genetic Investigation for the Micro-organisms DAVID Good. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt We. Inclusion . eleven. Segregation due to the fact Proof of Easy Genetic Manage . A great. The new hereditary approach to biology . B. The brand new recognition from segregation . 111. The foundation from Genetic Mapping . B. The latest sequencing away from loci with the a beneficial linkage chart: multi-grounds crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic okay-structure . Elizabeth. Deletion mapping . IV. Functional Genetic Evaluation . A good. Prominence evaluation . Bplementation testing . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Data for the Eukaryotic Microorganisms . A. Standard factors . 1. dos. Tetrad research . B. Hereditary study specifically bacteria step one. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger or any other “imperfect” fungus step 3. Neurospora crassa . 4. Most other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . six. Filamentous basidiomycetes . 7. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . nine. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Hereditary Data for the Prokaryotes . Good. Standard considerations . step one. Fertility brands and you can conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and you may co-transduction . 3. Sales and co-sales cuatro. Non-selective research .
fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Watson, W
Hereditary analysis particularly organisms step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or any other Enteric micro-organisms . dos. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you will Ps. putida . 3. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor or any other actinomycetes . 5. Almost every other germs C. Certified mapping strategies independent out of recombination VII. Genetic Data from inside the Worms Good. Standard considerations . step 1. Version of viral genomes dos. Great features out of malware genes B. Genetic study in particular worms step 1. Bacteriophages 2. Animal worms step three. Bush worms VIII. Concluding Opinions Records .